3 recalls found. |
DEFECT #1 - SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:SUPPLY:CHECK VALVE
Posted on: 1979-10-12
Description
Consequence
Corrective Action
Notes
Ford campaign no h-7e.bus chassis.possibility that the double vacuum tanksfor brake booster assemblies may have a vacuum check valve reversedduringinstallation.if this condition exists and is left uncorrected it could resultin reduced braking effectiveness.(correct by inspecting and replace tankswhere necessary.)
DEFECT #2 - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS
Posted on: 1981-08-14
Description
Consequence
Corrective Action
Notes
Trucks and buses equipped with split hydraulic brake systems.possibility thatbrake tubes may have been routed so that ther e is insufficient clearancebetween steel brake line and trans mission housing. This could cause brake lineto be penetratedby chafing action, resulting in noticeable reduction invehicl e braking ability.(correct by replacing and rerouting wherenecessary.)
DEFECT #3 - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST:VACUUM
Posted on: 1979-10-12
Description
Consequence
Corrective Action
Notes
Ford campaign no h-73.f,b,c,ln-500-750, 6000-7000 & c-l 800- 900 seriestrucks equipped with frame mounted brake booster. Possibility that improperlymachined brake booster may have be en installed, which could result ininsufficient seal at hydra ulic end cap.if this condition exists, hydraulicbrake fluidleaks would gradually deplete brake fluid reserve resulting i ncomplete loss of hydraulic brake system on vehicles equippedwithsinglehydraulic seal where necessary).necessary.eabl