Recalls for your 1974 Fmc 2900r

Recalls for 1974 Fmc 2900r

RSS Feed


3 recalls found.
All Fmc Recalls
'73-'76 FMC 2900R

Foden Alpha posted a photo:

'73-'76 FMC 2900R

I spotted this super malaise Motor Coach in town.
The owner is a security guard and uses this as their living quarters when on duty.
What a thing of great beauty!

"The FMC Motorhome has an interesting lineage, FMC is the acronym for Food Machinery Corporation. FMC got its started in 1883 when inventor John Bean developed an innovative insecticide pump. The name was changed from the John Bean Manufacturing Company to the Food Machinery Corporation in 1928 when the company got into the canning machinery business. The company kept adding mechanized products and eventually started producing amphibious vehicles for the military.

During a lull in its military vehicle contracts in the late 1960s, FMC turned its sights towards recreational vehicles. By 1972, FMC had transferred personnel from its ordnance division and formally launched a motor coach division in Santa Clara, California. Initial prototypes were 19 and 23 feet long, but neither went into production. FMC settled on a 29 foot size, and the first one was completed in late 1972.

FMC coaches were manufactured from 1973-1976.

The 1973 energy crisis put a damper on the manufacture of all brands of motorhomes, so FMC was in a difficult position from the beginning. By 1975, FMC had a contract to produce the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, and in September 1976 converted all tooling in its factory to the manufacture of tanks. The FMC motor coach had reached a dead end. The final tally for the FMC was slightly more than 1,000 units, approximately 135 of which were transit buses."

More info at fmcmotorcoach.com

DEFECT #1 - SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM:UPPER ARM


Posted on: 1979-10-12
Description


Consequence


Corrective Action


Notes
Fmc campaign no a0507.motor coach.possibility that the upper a arm pivotshaft and arm bushing may be subject to penetration of salt-laden road waters.if this condition exists, the upper arm bushing could fail resulting in seizureof the upper arm pivot shaft.this condition could result in loss of supportfor the front wheel spindle and possible loss of steering control.(correct byinspecting and installing an improved bushing design).motor coach.

DEFECT #2 - STEERING:LINKAGES


Posted on: 1979-10-12
Description


Consequence


Corrective Action


Notes
Fmc campaign no 2907 10002.motor coach.possibility that the pitman arm onthe power steering system could develop surface cracks which could causefailure of the arm when subjected to loads incurred by making full right orleft hand turns.failure of the pitman arm would cause loss of steeringcontrol.(correct by inpsecting and replacing arms and/or parts wherenecessary).

DEFECT #3 - SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST


Posted on: 1979-10-12
Description


Consequence


Corrective Action


Notes
Fmc campaign no 290910001.motor coach.possibility that the master cylinderand hydrovacs are not compatible.if this condition exists the residualpressure left in the hydraulic brake line from the master cylinder to thehydrovac does not allow the hydrovac to completely release the brakes.thevehicle can still move but if the brakes are still sufficiently applied theywill heat up and catch fire.(correct by inspecting and replacing thesubstitute hydrovacs).